Suman Yadav @ Suman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6290 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Suman Yadav @ Suman Kumar S/o Ramswarup Yadav @ Ramswaroopm Prasad Yadav Resident of village - Manjhala, P.S. - Rajauli, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 111 of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that 3500 CFT of stone chips along with seven tractors were recovered from the place of occurrence, accordingly the instant FIR was instituted alleging that accused were involved in illegal mining.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR nor the tractors which were seized from the place of occurrence belongs to him. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6290 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/3 submitted that seized tractors have already been released by the police in favour of their owners. It is also submitted that seized stone chips were subsequently stolen for which Rajauli P. S. Case No. 41 of 2025 was instituted but then the petitioner was not an accused in the said FIR. It is also submitted that no doubt the FIR has been instituted under Section 111 BNS, but then in the nature of allegations as alleged in the FIR, no offence under Section 111 of B.N.S. against the petitioner is made out. It is also submitted that Udesh Kumar had approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.66710 of 2025 and the same came to be allowed by an order dated 01.11.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Rajauli P. S. Case No.38 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6290 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 3/3 Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T