Babllo Hansda v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2397 of 2018 ====================================================== Babllo Hansda, Son of Sri Binod Hansda Resident of Village- Bathan Tola, Shitalpur, Post office- Siktia, Police Station- Azamnagar, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Purnea Division, Purnea. 3.

The District Collector, Katihar.

4.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Katihar. 5.

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Katihar.

6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Barsoi, District- Katihar. 7.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Barsoi, Katihar. 8.

The Block Development officer, Azamnagar, Katihar. 9.

The Circle officer, Azamnagar, Katihar.

10.

The Executive Engineer, Regional Engineering Organization, Work Division-2, Barsoi, Katihar.

11.

Shriti Kumari, Wife of Kanhaiya Lal Mandal, D/o Narayan Mandal @ Satyanarayan Mandal Resident of Village- Bishanpur, P.O. Sikti, P.S. Azamnagar, District Kaithar, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Shitalpur, Azamnagar, Katihar.

12.

Shiv Shankar Singh Convenor, son of late Khagen Singh, Resident of Village- Pahlagarh, P.O. Milik Pahalgarh, P.S. Kadwa, District Katihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jibendra Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Pushkar Narayan Shahi- AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 10-05-2019 This Public Interest Litigation raises dispute as to the site for construction of Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan, Shitalpur Panchayat within the district of Katihar. The petitioner happens

Patna High Court CWJC No.2397 of 2018(2) dt.10-05-2019 2/2 to be a Ward Member of the Panchayat.

Having considered the submissions, we are not at all inclined to grant any indulgence in such matters which are within the discretion of the Panchayat Authorities and/or the State in its concerned department and it is not for the Court to act as an adviser in such matters.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) mrl./- U