Drawpadi Dwivedi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2425 of 2016 In Cr. WJC 497 of 2014 ====================================================== Drawpadi Dwivedi, wife of Sri Ram Nivas Dwivedi, resident of village - Ugo, P.O. Khujwa, P.S. & Circle - Raghunathpur, District - Siwan, presently residing at Flat No. A - 1104, Koyala Vihar, Vasundhara, V.I.P. Road, P.O. Airpur, Kolkata, West Bengal .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Secretary, Home ( Police ) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Inspector General of Police, Muzaffarpur

6. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran Range, Chapra

7. The Superintendent of Police, Siwan

8. The Thanadhyaksh, Sarai Police Station, Makdoom Sarai, District - Siwan ... Respondent 1st Set.

9. The Bihar State Sugar Corporation through its Managing Director, at Arunalaya, Ram Jaipal Nagar, Bailey Road, Patna

10. The Cane Commissioner Cum Managing Director, Bihar State Sugar Corporation Limited at Sugar Cane Industry Department Vikash Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna

11. The S.K.G. Sugar Mill Siwan Unit ( Bihar State Sugar Corporation Limited ) at Makdoom Sarai, P.O. & District Siwan through its General Manager

12. The General Manager, S.K.G. Sugar Mill Siwan Unit ( Bihar State Sugar Corporation Limited ) at Makdoom Sarai, P.O. District - Siwan. .... Respondents 2nd Set.

13. The District Magistrate, Siwan

14. The Circle officer, Hussainganj, District - Siwan

Patna High Court MJC No.2425 of 2016 (2) dt.17-08-2016 2/2 .... .... Respondents 3rd Set.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subash Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 By way of the present application preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks restoration of Cr. WJC No. No. 497 of 2014 which stood dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 02.06.2016 passed by this Court.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that counsel for the petitioner failed to appear before the Court when the matter was called out and by the time he entered into the court room, the case was already dismissed for want of prosecution.

Regard being had to the submission made at the Bar, Cr. WJC No. No. 497 of 2014 is directed to be restored to its original file. The application stands allowed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T