← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9976/2024bail rejected

Nitish Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-24Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33465 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2016 Thana- ECONOMIC OFFENCES, BIHAR District- Patna ====================================================== Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh Son of Lakshman Singh, Residence of Village -Vishwambharpur Sutihar PS -Derni District- Saran Bihar 841222 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

the State of Bihar through Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Unit, Patna Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sumit Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the EOU/s :

Mr.Vijay Anand, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-01-2025 Heard Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh along with Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Vijay Anand, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Economic Offence Unit.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No.8000077 of 2016, Supplementary Record of Special Case No.20 of 2016 arising out of Economic Offence P.S.Case No.04/2016 (Patna) dated 15.05.2016, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii) (c)/25/29 of N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

3. Considering the nature of allegation, as well as, the complicity of the petitioner in alleged crime, I am not inclined

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33465 of 2024(2) dt.20-01-2025 2/2 to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Economic Offence Unit, Bihar appears to have shown his negligence in proceeding to get the witnesses examined. He is directed to produce each and every witness(s) on the date fixed for conduct of the trial without fail.

5. The learned Trial court is also directed to expedite the trial in view of the fact that two co-accused persons, namely, Dharmendra Kumar Rajak and Mr. Santosh Kumar Mahto @ Bali Mahto have been convicted and I have found that there are sufficient materials and the evidences before the learned trial court to adjudicate the case in accordance with law.

6. The present bail application is accordingly disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/- U