Sanny @ Sanny Yadav @ Sanny Samrat @ Santosh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17926 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2020 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== SANNY @ SANNY YADAV @ SANNY SAMRAT @ SANTOSH YADAV S/O Ramniwash Singh R/o Vill- Dhanpura, P.S.- Azimabad, Dist. - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-09-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove all the defects as pointed out by office within four weeks after start of normal functioning of the Court. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Rita Verma, learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Udwantnagar (Gajrajganj) P.S. Case No.334/2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b) a, 26 of the Arms Act. He is in custody since 04.09.2020.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution story when the petitioner was arrested, he admitted his involvement in several other cases and at his instance from a nearby ditch police has seized one country made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17926 of 2021(4) dt.27-09-2021 2/3 pistol.

Learned counsel submits that the pistol has not been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. So far as the six cases stated in paragraph '3' are concerned, learned counsel submits on query that the petitioner is on bail in all those cases.

Ms. Rita Verma, learned APP for the State has though opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner, but considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the place of recovery being a ditch and not from this petitioner and further that the petitioner has remained in jail for over one year and in all other cases he is on bail, this Court directs that the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Udwantnagar (Gajrajganj) P.S. Case No.334/2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 437 (3) Cr.P.C.

And further condition that henceforth once in every two months the petitioner shall mark his attendance before the S.H.O. of Azimabad police station in the District of Bhojpur and shall keep on furnishing his complete whereabouts and mobile

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17926 of 2021(4) dt.27-09-2021 3/3 number to the S.H.O. If he is required to go outside the jurisdiction of the police station in connection with any employment etc. then also he will furnish his address and other information to the S.H.O. Non-compliance with this condition shall be reported by the S.H.O. of Azimabad police station to the learned court below and steps shall be taken for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner.

And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.