Jaiymanti Devi @ Jaymanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8232 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-584 Year-2022 Thana- MANER District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Jaiymanti Devi @ Jaymanti Devi Wife Of Siddhnath Saw R/V- Maner, Bazar, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 2.

Rabba Kumar @ Rajrappa Kumar Son Of Siddhnath Saw R/V- Maner, Bazar, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 3.

Shambhu Nath Saw @ Shambhu Kumar Son Of Late Gopi Saw R/V- Maner, Bazar, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna 4.

Soni Devi Wife Of Shambhu Nath Saw @ Shambhu Kumar R/V- Maner, Bazar, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shrinandan Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kumar Sameer, Adv.

For the Opposite party Mr. Ghanshyam, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506, 34 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained grievous injury. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8232 of 2023(2) dt.17-04-2023 2/2 He submits that there is specific allegation against the husband of the petitioner no. 1. He submits that the informant and the petitioners are next door neighbours in the village. He further submits that petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 4 have no criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 3 has criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State and informant oppose the prayer for bail and submit that there is common intention to kill the informant.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Maner P.S. Case No. 584 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T