← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2175/2020disposed

Awadhesh Yadav @ Avadhesh Gop v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-31Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2175 of 2020 ====================================================== Awadhesh Yadav @ Avadhesh Gop Son of Balkishun Yadav @ Vakjushun Gop, Resident of Village-Abtalachak, Police Station-Chandi, DistrictNalanda, At Present Resident of Village-Babhawan Bigha, Police StationTharthari, District-Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

THe Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Director, Mass Education, Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Education Officer, Nalanda.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey ( Aag15 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 31-01-2020 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the respondent State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner raised in the instant writ proceeding is covered by the decision of a Division Bench of this Court passed in the case of Shaligram Prasad Singh & ors vs The State of Bihar & ors. passed in MJC No. 243 of 2018. The relevant portion relied upon is as follows:- "The writ applications which have been filed after 26th of February, 2016, except one as indicated hereinabove, are also disposed of on the same terms giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the State Government after the

Patna High Court CWJC No.2175 of 2020(2) dt.31-01-2020 2/2 judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Diary No.25804 of 2017 if the Hon'ble Supreme Court grants any relief to the persons similarly situated to the petitioners."

Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is disposed of.

It is made clear that it would be open to the petitioner to approach the court or seek remedy in accordance with law after disposal of SLP (C ) No. 25804 of 2017. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U