Yogendra Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12591 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2020 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

YOGENDRA MEHTA S/O ASHARFI MEHTA R/O SIMRI, WARD NO.1, P.S.-KARJAIN, DISTRICT-SUPAUL.

2.

ASHARFI MEHTA S/O ANUP MEHTA R/O SIMRI, WARD NO.1, P.S.- KARJAIN, DISTRICT-SUPAUL.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard both the parties through video conferencing. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No.105 of 2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from the medical evidence, it is apparent that the doctor has noticed that the patient was admitted with complaint of loss of consciousness two days back, history of fall of one month ago and she has not died on account of injuries. Learned counsel further submits that there are no injury report. However, I have gone through the order passed and I find that the learned court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12591 of 2021(3) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 below has noticed that the statement of the complainant and lady who was beaten up and later on died.

Keeping in view as the investigation is continued and the case under Section 307 IPC, which may be converted into Section 302 IPC, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

The same is accordingly dismissed.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- U T