← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7664/2023allowed

Abhinandan Kumar @ Ghanti v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-17Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7664 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2022 Thana- JANDAHA District- Vaishali ====================================================== Abhinandan Kumar @ Ghanti, Son of Raj Kumar Paswan, Resident of Village- Rampur Ramhar, P.S.- Jandaha, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376(D)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/12 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offence (POCSO) Act.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that while the daughter of the informant was going to school, coaccused Amod Ram abducted her and committed gang rape with her in collusion with co-accused Raushan Kumar, Chhotu Paswan and three unknown persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7664 of 2023(3) dt.17-05-2023 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The victim in her statement recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. has not named the petitioner whereas she has named co-accused Amod Ram. The name of the petitioner has been transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Kunal Kumar. Victim has not whispered about the complicity of petitioner in the alleged offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 15.09.2022.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7664 of 2023(3) dt.17-05-2023 3/3 connection with Jandaha P.S. Case No. 277 of 2022 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge, POCSO, Vaishali at Hajipur.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) nirajkrs/- U T