← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./5927/2025bail granted

Sunil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-02-15Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5927 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2024 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Sunil Yadav S/O Nageshwar Yadav R/O Village- Pubari Tola, Phulparas, P.S.- Phulparas, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner is named in F.I.R. and apprehending his arrest in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 407 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 1259.4 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the partly construed house.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the alleged recovery of illicit liquor appears to be made from partly constructed house, which is a joint family property of the petitioner. It is submitted that due to only part construction, the premises in issue is an open place and accessible

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5927 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 2/3 by general public and, therefore, it cannot be said that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner. It is submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case of similar nature, where he is on bail.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as recovery of alleged illicit liquor not appears prima facie to be made from conscious physical possession of this petitioner, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, District- Madhubani/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 407 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS, with further condition that:- (i) That the petitioner shall not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5927 of 2025(2) dt.15-02-2025 3/3 involve in similar nature of offence till the conclusion of trial, failing which, the State shall be at liberty to move before the learned Trial Court itself for the cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T