Om Prakash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17418 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-420 Year-2020 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== OM PRAKASH KUMAR Son of Baban Singh R/O Village - Subba Bigha, Jamuhar, P.S. - Dehri (T), District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
Liquor was recovered from a vehicle standing near the house of the petitioner.
Submission is that the place of recovery is a public place. Neither the vehicle belongs to the petitioner nor the liquor belongs to the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.
Considering no direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17418 of 2021(2) dt.24-11-2021 2/2 surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Dehri (T) Police Station Case No. 420 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
(c) The petitioner shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T