Santosh Kumar Sah @ Satish Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6059 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-399 Year-2024 Thana- PHULPARAS District- Madhubani ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Sah @ Satish Kumar Sah Son of Ramchandra Sah R/oVillage - Narhiya, P.S.- Narhiya, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 399 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 109, 61(2), 351(2), 351(3) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, on the alleged date and time, three unknown miscreants boarded on a motorcycle opened fire upon his son. Informant suspects that this petitioner with the help of other unknown miscreants hatched a conspiracy to commit the murder of the informant's son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that general and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6059 of 2025(4) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that except suspicion, there is no material against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that as per the material available in the case diary, the specific allegation of firing is against co-accused Mahadev. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.09.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, there being nothing specific against this petitioner as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 399 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T