Niraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINALAPPEAL (SJ) No.562 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2020 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== NIRAJ KUMAR SINGH S/o Sri Vinda Singh R/o village- Jaitiya Simari, P.O.- Nabinagar Road, P.S.- Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Abhay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.
This appeal has been filed for setting aside the order dated 30.09.2021 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge (Children Court), Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 83 of 2020.
The impugned order mentions that the allegation against the appellant is serious in nature. The appellant is named in the first information report and there is sufficient evidence against him.
The report of the Social Investigation shows that the
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.562 of 2022(3) dt.11-08-2022 2/2 appellant has criminal antecedent. The appellant's family members do not have good reputation in the village. He always ready to do any unlawful activities by the direction of his associates. Further the report contains that there is complete lack of educational environment of his family.
It seems that the appellant has moved on deviated path of crime and if not stopped, he may emerge as a deviant and unlawful citizen in future. His parents and siblings are unable to control his behaviour.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the report of the Probation Officer as also the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this court does not find any error in the orders of the Court below. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
Let the defects as pointed out by the office be removed within a period of four weeks.
shailendra/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T