Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5880 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2019 Thana- DHANARUA District- Patna ====================================================== PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Krishna Prasad, Resident of Village - Redibigha, P.S.- Dhanarua, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Harsh Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Dhanarua P.S. Case No.418 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)(a)/26/35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is also accused in two more cases.

As per prosecution case, while the petitioner and other accused persons were arrested while preparing for some occurrence and arms and cartridges were recovered from the possession of the petitioner and other accused persons. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 09.10.2019. Further submission is that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5880 of 2020(2) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 possession of the petitioner.

Heard learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Be that as it may, considering facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail once charge has been framed or after six months of custody, whichever is earlier.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) nawalkrs/- U T