Vikky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7814 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Saran ====================================================== Vikky Kumar, S/o- Lakhan Prasad, R/o Village -Apahar, P.S. Amnour, DistSaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Mahashweta Sinha, Inspector cum SHO Mahila, Saran at Chapra Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 79, 111, 141, 143, 145, 98, 296 and 3 (5) of BNS, Section 13 and 14 of POCSO Act, Section 79 of J.J. Act, Sections 3,4,5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (prevention) Act, 1956 and Section 16 of Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the helper of Supriya Orchestra and that after raiding the house of the proprietor, two girls were recovered. The girls allegedly disclosed that they were forced to dance in an Orchestra.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7814 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the order of the learned trial Court, it is evident that the learned trial Court has recorded that the recovered girls have given their statement under Section 183 of the BNSS wherein they have stated that they were working in the Orchestra. It has also been submitted that admittedly, the petitioner is only the helper of the Orchestra. He is having no criminal antecedent. It has also been submitted that one of the co-accused Mukesh Prasad has been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 85156 of 2025. The case this petitioner stands on similar footing. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.10.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 87 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7814 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 3/3 Exclusive Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO), Saran at Chapra.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T