← Library
Patna High Court/7580/2026bail granted

Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-04Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7580 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2025 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Prince Kumar S/O Ashok Ray @ Ashok Kumar Ray R/O Vill and P.o.- Kerwan, P.S.- Isuapur, dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rananjay Kumar, Advocate :

Mrs. Chhateshwari Kumari, Advocate :

Md. Shahid Jawed, Advocate :

Mr. Aamir Suhail, Advocate :

Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S.

3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that all the accused persons including the petitioner came variously armed and indulged in assaulting the son of the informant causing injury to him.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main allegation of assault on the head of the son of the informant is upon Sudhanshu Kumar and Shantanu Kumar at the order of Ashutosh Kumar and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has already granted the privilege of anticipatory bail to co-accused Ashutosh Kumar vide order dated 11.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.48835 of 2025. So far as the petitioner is concerned, his case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7580 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 stands on a better footing as the allegation against him is confined to snatching of some jewellery and there is no specific act of assault attributed to him.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the basis of allegations made in the First Information Report.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and considering the fact that there is no specific act of assault attributed to the present petitioner, coupled with the fact that the alleged order giver has already been granted privilege anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T