Vinod Kumar v. Pinki Devi @ Pinki Singh (Pramukh)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.84 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.695 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Vinod Kumar son of Motilal Sah, Resident of Village and Post Chaita, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 2.

Sunita Bharti, Wife of Baiju Pandit Resident of village and Post- Badka Gaon, Police Station Pakridayal, District- East Champaran at Motihari. 3.

Rubi Devi, Wife of Naresh Kumar Pandit, Resident of village and Post Dhanauji, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

Nitu Devi, wife of Nathuni Mukhiya, resident of village and Post Sisahani, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 5.

Vibha Devi, wife of Suresh Rai @ Suresh Prasad Yadav Resident of Village and Post Sirha, Police Station Pakridayal, District-East Champaran at Motihari.

6.

Ruby Kumari, wife of Sanjay Kumar, Resident of Village and Post Sirha, Police Station Pakridayal, District- East Champaran at Motihari. 7.

Rima Devi, Wife of Rakesh Sahni, Resident of Village Tharbhitia, Post Office- Majhauliya, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

Pinki Devi @ Pinki Singh (Pramukh) Wife of Manoj Kumar Singh, Resident of Village and Post Office Sundarpatti, Police Station Pakridayal, District East Champaran at Motihari.

2.

Rajesh Kumar (Up Pramukh), Son of Raghuvir Bhagat, Resident of Village and Post Chorma, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

3.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 6.

The District Panchayati Raj Officer, East Champaran at Motihari. 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Pakridayal, East Champaran at Motihari. 8.

The Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Block Pakridayal, East Champaran at Motihari.

9.

The Block Development Officer-cum-Executive Officer, Block Pakridayal Panchayat Samiti, East Champaran at Motihari. 10.

The State Election Commission through the Secretary, 3rd Floor, Sone Bhawan, Daroga Rai Path, R Block Chauraha, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar (800001).

11.

The Secretary, State Election Commission through the Secretary, 3rd Floor,

Patna High Court L.P.A No.84 of 2025(7) dt.18-08-2025 2/3 Sone Bhawan, Daroga Rai Path, R Block Chauraha, Beer Chand Patel Path, Patna, Bihar (800001).

12.

Haridwar Paswan, Son of Palak Paswan, Resident of Village and Post Akauna Chorma, Police Station - Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

13.

Indu Devi, Wife of Dashai Hajara, Resident of Village and Post Rajepur Nawada, Police Station- Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 14.

Ajay Kumar Baitha, son of Vishwanath Baitha, Resident of Village and Post Ajgarwa, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari. 15.

Sima Suman Devi, wife of Kishori Thakur, Resident of Village and Post - Harnathpur, Police Station Pakridayal, District - East Champaran at Motihari.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushik, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pratik Kumar Sinha, AC to GA-05 For S.E.C.

:

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 18-08-2025 Heard Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Pratik Kumar Singh, learned AC to GA-05 for the State and Mr. Ravi Ranjan, learned counsel appearing for the State Election Commission.

2. Learned advocate for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal as the appellants have already filed interlocutory application in the writ petition for vacating the ad interim relief granted by the learned Single Judge.

3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

Patna High Court L.P.A No.84 of 2025(7) dt.18-08-2025 3/3

4. Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

5. Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

6. It is clarified that we have not examined the merits of the case of the appellants.

7. We request the learned Single Judge to examine the I.A. filed by the present appellants on its own merits. (Vipul M. Pancholi, CJ) (Partha Sarthy, J) K.C.Jha/- U