← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7006/2023allowed

Prince Kumar Yadav @ Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-13Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7006 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2022 Thana- FALKA District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

PRINCE KUMAR YADAV @ PRINCE KUMAR Son of Pappu Yadav @ Prabhash Kumar Yadav R/V- Dira Chandpur, P.S- Falka (Pothiya) DistKatihar 2.

patla Yadav @ Paltu Yadav @ Paltu Kumar son of Khokha Yadav R/V- Dira Chandpur, P.S- Falka (Pothiya) Dist- Katihar 3.

Laddu Yadav @ Laddu Kumar son of Bipendra Yadav R/V- Dira Chandpur, P.S- Falka (Pothiya) Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jibendra Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-04-2023 Heard the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that they alongwith other co-accused persons assaulted the informant's side by means of gun.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7006 of 2023(2) dt.13-04-2023 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is a case and counter case between the parties. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties and both sides are agnates. He further submits that no person was injured in the present case. Petitioners have criminal antecedent, mentioned in para-3 of the bail application. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Falka (Pothiya) P.S. Case No.312 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T