Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6946 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-628 Year-2019 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Vinod Kumar @ Vinod Yadav S/o- Vijay Yadav @ Saina Yadav Resident of village- Puraibagh PS- Barh District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barh P.S. Case No.628 of 2019, lodged on 31.12.2019, for the offence punishable 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per prosecution, recovery of 20 liters of Mahua wine along with apparatus for manufacturing Mahua wine have been the subject matter of the present case.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that only 20 liters of Mahua Wine has been recovered but petitioner has not been apprehended nor anybody has disclosed about him. Counsel submits that petitioner has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6946 of 2025(2) dt.19-02-2025 2/2 been made accused by the police only due to the reason that his criminal antecedent is not clean. Counsel submits that antecedent of the petitioner is not clean. There are three criminal cases pending against the petitioner in which he is on bail.
4. Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there are three criminal antecedent of the petitioner.
5. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail is refused. However, in the event of surrender of the petitioner within four weeks from today, the prayer for regular bail shall be considered without being prejudiced by the order of this Court on the same day. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Mkr./- U T