Sunil Ray And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41493 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2015 Thana -DIGHWARA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Sunil Ray, son of Dhodha Ray

2. Dhorha Ray @ Dhora Ray son of Late Pancham Ray Both are resident of village- Paguraha Kuraiya, P.S.- Dighwara, DistrictSaran (Chapra). ... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anish Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 25-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Dhiraj Kumari, the daughter of the informant, was married to Rajesh Rai the son of petitioner no. 2 and out of the wedlock there is a daughter aged 6 months but due to non fulfillment of golden chain and ring she was being tortured and ultimately she was killed and her dead body was also thrown in river Ganges.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioners are Bhaisur and old father-in-law, they are living

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41493 of 2015 (3) dt.25-01-2016 2/2 separately from the husband of the deceased since long having no concern with the family affairs of the deceased and her husband, the petitioner no.1 is in custody since 23.06.2015 and petitioner no. 2 is since 18.05.2015, the informant after knowing the reality has filed compromise petition also and as such petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration to which learned A.P.P. opposes. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner are bhaisur and father-in-law and further considering that now the informant is retracting from his earlier version, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M.

, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T