← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7224/2022allowed

Kaili Devi @ Shaili Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-01Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7224 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.

Kaili Devi @ Shaili Devi Wife of Ram Prakash Yadav Resident of VillageKamarganj, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. 2.

Ram Prakash Yadav Son of Late Banwari Prasad Yadav Resident of VillageKamarganj, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Md Fazle Karim For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Mahila P.S. Case No.47 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 498(A), 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioners, who are mother-in-law and father-inlaw of the informant, are said to have tortured the informant for non-fulfillment of demand of additional dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioners are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7224 of 2022(2) dt.01-08-2022 2/2 mother-in-law and father-in-law of the informant and no specific overt act is alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have no manner of concern with the family affairs of their son and daughter-in-law. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application.

The learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the fact that the petitioners are in-laws of the informant, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-II, Bhagalpur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No.47 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T