← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11033/2024disposed

Hariom Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-12Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11033 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2022 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Hariom Singh S/O BALDEV SINGH R/O VILLAGE- KARISATH, PS. UDWANTNAGAR (GAJRAJGANJ), DIST. BHOJPUR.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-07-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned APP for the State.

2. The earlier regular bail petition of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 67117 of 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for the same occurrence, the member of defense side Rohit Kumar has also lodged a case. Rohit Kumar, the informant of that case, has suffered six bullet injuries on his person. He has submitted further that the fresh ground for renewal of his bail application is that the trial is going on at the snail pace.

4. A report was called for from the learned court below about the stage of trial which has been received. It

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11033 of 2024(3) dt.12-07-2024 2/2 appears that when the report was called for from the learned court below, thereafter, the case was committed to the Court of Sessions.

5. It appears from the report of the learned court below that even the charges have not been framed up-till now, the learned court below is directed to frame the charge immediately. In case some of the accused persons are absconding, the charges shall be framed after splitting the trial of the petitioner.

6. The learned trial court shall take every endeavor to dispose of the trial within one year. If the trial is not concluded within the stipulated period, the petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail.

7. With these observations, this petition stands disposed of.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T