Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6115/2026bail rejected

Birendra Chauhan @ Birendar Chauhan @ Virendra Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-30Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6115 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2023 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Birendra Chauhan @ Birendar Chauhan @ Virendra Chauhan S/O Chhotu Chauhan @ Chchotu Chauhan Resident of Village - Mojahirpur, P.S. - Islampur, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shyamal Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 483 of 2024, arising out of Islampur P.S. Case No. 527 of 2023, instituted for the offences under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier vide order dated 07.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7134 of 2025, regular bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court considering the nature and gravity of the offence as also there being direct and specific allegation against the petitioner, with a liberty to renew the prayer after six months if the trial is not concluded.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.12.2023

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6115 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 without any rhymes or reason.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

6. There is no fresh ground to consider the bail petition of the petitioner.

7. In view of the above, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is again rejected with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of one months from today. If the trial is not concluded within the period of one month, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer before the court below. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T