Kumari Gita, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2689 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Kumari Gita, Wife of Chandrika Baitha, Resident of Village-Singasani, Ramgarhwa, District-East Champaran, Bihar-845433. 2.

Seeta Devi, Wife of Pralok Kumar, Resident of Village-Uchchibhatiya, Ward No. 10, Ramgarhwa, East Champaran, Bihar-845433. 3.

Anita Kumari, Wife of Jitendra Kumar, Resident Ghogharaha Bairia, Ward No. 2, Bairiyadih, East Champaran, Bihar-845435. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The District Education Officer, Motihari, East Champaran. 5.

The District Programme Officer (Training RMSA and Literacy), East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (Gp23) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 20-02-2020 The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is non-payment of remuneration.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have regularly worked as Tola Sevak but they have not been paid remuneration.

The issue of payment of remuneration requires verification of the record and as such the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-District Education Officer/District Programme Officer, Motihari, East Champaran

Patna High Court CWJC No.2689 of 2020(2) dt.20-02-2020 2/2 to verify the records to ascertain whether the petitioners have worked as Tola Sevak or not for the period he is claiming salary. In case, if it is found that the petitioners have worked for the period they are claiming remuneration, the respondents shall ensure payment of salary for the period the petitioners have actually worked.

Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U