Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6813 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-666 Year-2025 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Guddu son of Md Kalu @ Kalu Resident of village- Juljuli Ward no. 32, PsKishanganj District -Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 666 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that from the possession of the petitioner, altogether 8.84 grams of smack was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6813 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 possession of this petitioner. The witness of the seizure list are police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS, while making the seizure. He further submits that the alleged recovery of contraband is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 05.12.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases out of which one is of similar nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, (NDPS Act), Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S. Case No. 666 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T