Ravi Shankar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9150 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2025 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Ravi shankar sah Son of Arjun Sah @ Arjun Prasad Sah Resident Of Village- Hajipur, Ward No 20, Ps- Khagaria, District- Khagaria 2.

Swati Devi Wife of Ravi Shankar Sah Resident Of Village- Hajipur, Ward No 20, Ps- Khagaria, District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Priyanshu Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 137(2), 96, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 19.06.2025 at about 4 AM, daughter of informant had gone to attend the call of nature, in the meantime, co-accused Navin Kumar, Samso Kumar and Sonu Kumar Gupta came and forcibly kidnapped her. It is further alleged that when informant went to house of co-accused Navin Kumar to make complain, he was abused and assaulted by these petitioners and other co-accused persons.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9150 of 2026(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of kidnapping is against coaccused Navin Kumar, Samso Kumar and Sonu Kumar Gupta. This petitioners are only alleged to have abused and scuffled with informant when he went to house of co-accused Navin Kumar to make complain against kidnapping of his daughter. There is no allegation of kidnapping against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Khagaria in connection with Khagaria P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U T