Ram Babu Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6884 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2025 Thana- MAKER District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Ram Babu Rai S/o- Late Damodar Rai R/v- Chandila, Ps- Maker, DistSaran 2.
Dharmendra Rai S/o- Ram Babu Rai R/v- Chandila, Ps- Maker, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025 dated 25.06.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2)/127(2)/3/5/118(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the accused persons including the petitioners is of badly assaulting the Informant by means of iron rod, danda and brick due to which he sustained injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for allegation which is levelled in the F.I.R., there is a counter version to the entire incident which is said to have been lodged by one of the accused persons in which the allegation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6884 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 outraging modesty and committing theft is alleged when no male member was present in the house for which the F.I.R. was lodged bearing Maker P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025. It is next submitted that the injury, which is said to have been caused on the head of the Informant, has been found to be simple in nature while second injury is said to be grievous in nature, while the allegations are general and omnibus and there is nothing specific against these petitioners.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the allegations are general and omnibus, there is a case and counter case as also there being nothing specific against these petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6884 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioners who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bonds by the Trial Court itself.
(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T