Viimlesh Ray @ Vimalesh Ray v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6460 of 2018 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.602 of 2018 ====================================================== Viimlesh Ray @ Vimalesh Ray, Son of Raj Narayan Ray, resident of VillageLapatha @ Laptaha, P.S.- Parihar, District- Sitamarhi.... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Collector/District Magistrate- Sitamarhi.

3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

4. The Excise Superintendent, Sitamarhi.

5. The Sub-Inspector, Excise, Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Alok For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha -Ga1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 10-12-2018 In this case vide order dated 16.03.2018 a provisional release of the vehicle has already been directed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the vehicle has already been provisionally released. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the confiscation proceeding final order has already been passed on 03.11.2017 in Confiscation Case No. C2-162 of 2017 by the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi. In view of the judgment passed passed by the Hon'ble Full Bench of this Court in L. P. A. No. 1647 of 2015 on 01.11.2018, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not challenge the competence of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6460 of 2018(3) dt.10-12-2018 2/2 District Magistrate in the matter of initiation of confiscation proceeding and shall take an opportunity to file statutory appeal before the appellate authority under the provisions of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

In the given facts and circumstances, this Court grant leave to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of 30 days from today along with application for condonation of delay before the appellate authority under the Act. If such an appeal along with application for condonation of delay is filed within the given period, the appellate authority shall consider the same on merits and shall dispose of it within a period of three months from the date of presentation of the appeal keeping in mind that it relates to confiscation of vehicle and early disposal of the appeal would be in the interest of the State. So far as the provisional release of the vehicle is concerned, the said order shall remain in force till disposal of the appeal. The petitioner shall abide by the final order passed by the appellate authority. (Jyoti Saran, J) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U