Nabab Giri @ Nevav Giri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8786 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nabab Giri @ Nevav Giri S/o- Gaya Nand Giri @ Batahu Giri R/v- Aalampur W.No-7, Ps- Bibhutipur Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1) and 109 of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 08.11.2025. It is next submitted that informant alleges that on 27.05.2025, his father was going to get maize, at 07:50 a.m., when he was intercepted by the accused persons and Rahul assaulted the father of the informant by rod, sword and Kudal causing injury on head, thereafter, the police was informed and the injured was taken to the hospital for treatment from where he was referred to the Sadar Hospital, Samastipur for better treatment.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8786 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting the informant is against Rahul. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation took place in which both sides assaulted each other but then the allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that petitioner is not a criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Bibhutipur P.S. Case No. 204 of 2025.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T