Sangam Kumari @ Bijul v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8351 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Sangam Kumari @ Bijul D/o- Chhanga Nut R/v- Daulatabad PsMohammabad Dist-Ghajipur UP 2.

Mohan Kumar S/o- Raja Ram R/v- Jahurabad, Chakjanav Ps- Bareshar DistGhajipur 3.

Rajan Kumar @ Rjan Kumar @ Rjjan Kumar @ Rjjan S/o- Binod Ram R/vDaulatabad Ps-Mohammabad Dist-Ghajipur UP ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 303(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. Later on, Sections 112, 317(2) and 317(5) of BNS were added.

3. The case of the prosecution is that some unknown miscreants have snatched golden chain with locket worth of Rs. 1.5 lacs.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioners were remanded in this case from Sasaram Mufassil P.S. Case No. 338 of 2025 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8351 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2 thereafter, they have given their confessional statement. Nothing has been recovered from their possession. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against them. No TIP was conducted in this case. Moreover, the petitioner no. 1 is languishing in judicial custody since 01.11.2025 and petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are languishing in judicial custody since 04.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are having one criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 3 is having three criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T