← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4695/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Jageshwar Kumar @ Jageshwar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4695 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Jageshwar Kumar @ Jageshwar Paswan Son of Brahmdeo Paswan, Resident of Village- Ganesh Chak, P.S. Mohanpur, and District- Gaya. 2.

Purushotam Kumar, Son of Mundrika Paswan, Resident of Village- Usas Deora, P.S. Konch and District - Gaya.

3.

Shankar Mahto @ Shiv Shankar Mahto, S/o Dilchand Mahto, Resident of Village- Ghikatiya Kala Maigara, P.S. Imamganj, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary Department of Home (Police) Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The Superintendent of Police Gaya.

4.

The Circle Officer Mohanpur District Gaya.

5.

The Circle Officer Imamganj District Gaya.

6.

The Circle Officer Konch District Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Manish Kumar (GP4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 20-04-2024 Upon repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner however, counsel for State is present.

2. Vide order dated 28.03.2024, it transpires to this Court that no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner and as a matter of last indulgence, this case was adjourned for one week with specific direction that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date fixed, appropriate order shall be passed. Today also, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. In this background, it transpires to this Court that

Patna High Court CWJC No.4695 of 2020(3) dt.20-04-2024 2/2 the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ application and therefore, this Court has no option left, but to pass the order in this writ application.

4. In this view of the matter, the present writ application stands dismissed due to non-prosecution. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U