Rajan Kumar @ Rjan Kumar @ Rajjan Kumar @ Rijan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6811 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-338 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Rajan Kumar @ Rjan Kumar @ Rajjan Kumar @ Rjjan Son of Binod Ram R/o-village- Daulatabad, P.S.- Mohammabad, Dist- Ghajipur, Uttar Pradesh (UP).

2.

Mohan Kumar Son of Raja Ram Resident of village- Jahurabad, Chakjanav, PS- Bareshar, Dist- Ghajipur, Uttar Pradesh (UP). 3.

Sangam Kumari @ Bijul Daughter of Chhanga Nut R/o- villageDaulatabad, P.S.- Mohammabad, Dist- Ghajipur, Uttar Pradesh (UP). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case no. 338 of 2025 registered under sections 303(2), 112, 317(2) and 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while doing puja, unknown accused persons stole her gold chain.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioners were falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. It is further

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6811 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 2/3 submitted that the material that has transpired in course of investigation has been dealt with in detail in the order of the learned trial Court from which it would transpire that there is no mention of any recovery of gold chain from the possession of the petitioners. The cause of false implication of the petitioners are their antecedents. The petitioners are in custody since 4.11.2025 and 30.10.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case and they undertake to cooperate in the trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. From perusal of the order of the learned trial Court it transpires that the material that has transpired in course of investigation has been dealt with in detail in the order of the learned trial Court. It transpires that the petitioner no.3 was caught by the public and handed over to the police wherein she named the other two petitioners as her accomplice. It is further stated that on search from them, a total of Rs. 68,500/- in cash, four mobile phones etc have been seized.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material on record including the details of the material that has transpired in course of investigation, taking into consideration the period of custody of the three petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6811 of 2026(2) dt.25-02-2026 3/3 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs that all the three petitioners above named be enlarged on bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case no. 338 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T