← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12598/2017dismiss for nonprosecution

Jai Virendra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-12-01Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12598 of 2017 ====================================================== Jai Virendra Son of Dharambir Singh Resident of Mohalla- Pakari Ara, P.S. Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Consolidation Director, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur.

4.

The District Development Commissioner, Ara, Bhojpur. 5.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Ara, Bhojpur.

6.

The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Ara, Bhojpur. 7.

The Consolidation Officer, Bhojpur.

8.

The Circle Officer, Udwant Nagar, Ara, Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ojha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, AC to SC 19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

for setting aside the declared (Sampust) Chak in Mauza Pakariyawar, Thana No. 233, P.S. and Udwant Nagar, District Bhojpur which is said to be declared on 31.03.1981 by the authority concerned as no one is in physical possession over the land in question in accordance with consolidation rather the present petitioner

Patna High Court CWJC No.12598 of 2017(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 and other villagers also is in physical possession as per survey and itself may be declared final for the interest of the petitioner.

3. It is the stand of the State that the petitioner claims to have purchased the land in the year 2013 but, however, in the year 1981 (31.03.1981) itself, the Chak land was confirmed. The submission is that even the said declaration has not been attached with the petition.

4. Be that as it may, since there is no appearance, dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U