Arjun Choudhary And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41750 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2015 Thana -KORHA District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Arjun Choudhary , son of Late Kailu Choudhary

2. Parwati Devi, wife of Arjun Choudhary Both resident of Gerabari, P.S.-Korha, District-Katihar.

3. Sntosh Kumar Choudhary @ Santosh Choudhary, son of Arjun Choudhary, resident of Telia Tola, Gerabari, P.S.- Korha, Distt. Katihar.

4. Lakhinder Kr. Mahto @ Lakhinder Prasad Mehta, resident of Bansgarha, P.S.-Korha, Distt. Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted under Sections 306, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added. Prosecution case is that informant's daughter was married to one Binod Kr. Choudhary who was murdered in the year 2014. On 9.7.2015 daughter of the informant died and there was a black circle ligature mark around her neck. It is a case of suicide.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41750 of 2015 (3) dt.15-10-2015 2 / 2 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they have got no criminal antecedent. They are in custody since 25.7.2015. There is no allegation of tampering of evidence against the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law of the deceased, petitioner no. 3 is brother-in-law of the deceased and petitioner no. 4 is the driver, who is employed by petitioner no. 1. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. They were separate in mess and property from the deceased after death of her husband. They have been falsely implicated in the present case.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,Katihar, in connection with Korha P.S. Case no. 114 of 2015.

(Sudhir Singh, J) sudip/- U T