Adalat Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11914 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1826 Year-2022 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Adalat Ansari Son Of Late Gulzar Ansari R/O Vill - Bishunpurwa, Purab Tola, P.S. - Lauriya, Distt. - West Champaran 2.

Amin Ansari Son Of Late Gulzar Ansari R/O Vill - Bishunpurwa, Purab Tola, P.S. - Lauriya, Distt. - West Champaran 3.

Sharif Mian Son Of Late Doma Mian R/O Vill - Bajwaniya, Kachari Tola, P.S. - Chanpatiya, Distt. - West Chamapran 4.

Shakina Khatoon D/O Sul Mohammad Ansari R/O Vill - Bajwaniya, Kachari Tola, P.S. - Chanpatiya, Distt. - West Chamapran 5.

Rahmat Ansari Son Of Late Gulzar Ansari R/O Vill - Bishunpurwa, Purab Tola, P.S. - Lauriya, Distt. - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 12-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364, 384, 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have kidnapped the son of the informant who is still traceless.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11914 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 2/3 this case. He submits that the petitioner no. 5 is father-in-law of the victim and petitioner nos. 1 and 2 is uncle of the wife of the victim and petitioner no. 4 and 5 is the mediator who had helped in solminizing the marriage of son of the informant. He submits that the son of the informant and the daughter of petitioner no. 5 is husband and wife and the same is evident from the fact that a case under Section 498A of the IPC has been filed by the daughter of the petitioner no. 5 against the son of the informant and his family members. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant opposing the prayer for bail submits that the victim is still traceless.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bettiah Complaint Case No. 1826C of 2022,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11914 of 2024(2) dt.12-03-2024 3/3 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T