Subhash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6048 of 2018 ====================================================== Subhash Kumar Singh Son of Sri Sukhdeo Singh, Resident of VillageVikram Englishpur, Dhanra, Police Station- Dhanroi, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The District Magistrate, District- Buxar, Bihar. 5.
The Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, District- Buxar. 6.
The District Project Officer, Itadhi, District- Buxar. 7.
The Block Development Officer, Itadhi Block, Buxar. 8.
The Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Buxar. 9.
The then Mukhi Village- Vikram Englishpur Panchayat, District- Buxar. 10.
Sri Anil Mishra, the then Panchayat Rojgar Sewak, Resident of VillageVikram Englishpur Panchayat District- Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Neerad Parashar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Anjani Kumar-Aag4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN) 19-07-2019 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. Mahesh Narayan Parbat, learned senior counsel appears for the Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank and learned Assisting Counsel to AAG-4 appears for the State. The complaint is made against the alleged irregularities committed by the respondent no. 10 in execution
Patna High Court CWJC No.6048 of 2018(2) dt.19-07-2019 2/2 of scheme under Manrega relating to the year 2013-14 and 2015-16 Although, we find from the records that some kind of application was filed before Public Grievance Redressal Officer, but no such issues have been raised either before the District Magistrate or the statutory authority concerned under the Panchayati Raj Act.
In such view of the matter, we are not persuaded to grant any indulgence in the matter. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) ( Partha Sarthy, J) sushma/- U T