Anand Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4418 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Anand Kumar Ram Son of Kishor Ram Resident of Ward No.02, VillageGhorashan Uttari, Bhagwanpur Kotwa, P.S. Ghora Sahan, District-East Champaran.

2.

Kavita Kumari Wife of Ramashray Baitha Resident of Ward No.07, VillageAjagari, P.S. Ajgari, District-East Champaran. 3.

Ajay Kumar Ram Son of Sarayug Ram Resident of Village- Bijabani Bichala Tola, P.S. Bijbani, District-East Champaran. 4.

Bishun Dev Ram Son of Sarayug Ram Resident of Village-Bijabani Bichala Tola, P.S. Bijbani, District-East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari. 4.

The District Education Officer, Motihari, East Champaran. 5.

The District Programme Officer (Training RMSA and LIteracy), East Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy 1 (SC 13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-03-2020 The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ petition is non-payment of remuneration.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have regularly worked as Tola Sevak but they have not been paid remuneration.

The issue of payment of remuneration requires verification of the record and as such the writ petition is

Patna High Court CWJC No.4418 of 2020(2) dt.03-03-2020 2/2 disposed of with a direction to the respondent-District Programme Officer (Training RMSA & Literacy), East Champaran to verify the records to ascertain whether the petitioners have worked as Tola Sevak or not for the period they are claiming salary. In case it is found that they have actually worked, the respondents shall ensure payment of salary for the period the petitioners have actually worked. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U