Pawan Yadav @ Anand Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10469 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2025 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Pawan Yadav @ Anand Kumar S/O Subhit Lal Yadav Resident Of Village - Bishanpur, P.S- Belhar, Dist.- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 352, 351(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that as the husband of the informant was coming home, all the accused persons along with other unknown persons stopped the informant's husband. The accused persons were armed with weapons. They assaulted the husband of the informant with knife, iron rod and lathi resulting in various injuries. It is further alleged that accused persons also looted Rs.10,000/- from the husband of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10469 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 nature of allegation is general and omnibus. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and from perusal of the order of the learned trial court it will go to show that learned trial court has recorded that the injury report of the injured Kamal Kishor Sah goes to show that he has received altogether six injuries wherein injury no.4 is grievous in nature and rest all the injuries are simple in nature. Injury no.4 is on left arm and the X-ray of left forearm shows fracture of left radius & ulna & fracture of 1st metacarpal left. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as this injury no.4 is on left forearm, though the same is grievous but bailable. Other injuries are simple in nature.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that learned trial court has rejected the bail of this petitioner as in trial court the conducting lawyer has concealed the antecedent of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases and he is languishing in judicial custody since 28.11.2025.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10469 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T