Nawada Vyapar Mandal Cooperative Society Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12643 of 2016 ====================================================== Nawada Vyapar Mandal Cooperative Society Ltd., Nawada through its Chairman, Geeta Prasad Singh, son of Late Jogeshwar Singh, Resident of village Ohari, Via-Kadirganj, District Nawada .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and civil Supply, Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi
3. Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation through its Managing Director, Patna
4. The District Magistrate, Nawada
5. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corpoation, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.
6. District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corpoation, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif.
7. The District Cooperative Officer, Nawda-cum-the Managing director, Nawada Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. Nawada-cumNodal Officer.
8. The District Supply Officer, Nawada
9. The Block Cooperative Officer, Nawada
10. the Circle Officer, Nawada Sadar, Nawada
11. M/s Shanker Rice Mill through its Proprietor Ashok Sao, Jangipur, Asthawan, District Nalanda .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Bohra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Smt.Nivedita Nirvikar, GA ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 In view of the situation discussed at Annexure-A to the counter affidavit of the Corporation in which even though the petitioner was appropriately instructed to contact the Quality Controller at Nalanda, not only he has failed to take cognizance of the letter but has also failed to contact the correct Quality Controller, no cause for indulgence is made out.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12643 of 2016 (12) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 The writ petition is disposed of.
The petitioner would be at liberty to take appropriate steps in view of the instructions issued.
Bibhash/- (Jyoti Saran, J) U