← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2974/2024disposed

Uma Shankar Singh v. Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation

2024-07-02Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2974 of 2024 ====================================================== Uma Shankar Singh son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of Mohalla- Juran Chapra, Road No.5, P.S.- Brahmpura, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation Muzaffarpur through its Chief Executive Officer.

2.

The Mayer, Municipal Corporation Muzaffarpur, At and P.s.-Muzaffarpur, District-Muzaffarpur.

3.

The City Municipal Commissioner, Muzaffarpur Municipal Corporation, Muzaffarpur.

4.

Uday Shankar Singh, son of Late Mahendra Singh, Resident of MohallaJuran Chapra, Road No.5, P.S.- Brahmpura, Dist.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Chandra Verma, Advocate Mr. Natraj Verma, Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar, Advocate For the MMC :

Mr.Anurag Saurav, Advocate Mr. Abhinav Alok, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate Mr. Prity Kumari, Advocate Mr. Sharda Raje Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 02-07-2024 Heard the parties.

2. This application has been preferred for quashing of the order dated 13.6.2023 passed by Municipal Commissioner, Muzaffarpur in Nigam Case No. 44 of 2023 as contained in Annexure-5 and notice dated 16.12.2023 issued vide letter No.2046 as contained in Annexure-7.

3. It has been pointed out by the respondents that the petitioner has rushed to this Court merely on a notice issued by

Patna High Court CWJC No.2974 of 2024(2) dt.02-07-2024 2/2 the respondent no.3.

4. The further submission is that details of the document that has been incorporated in the notice is/are also not the part of the record.

5. In that background, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he will be answering to the notice (letter No.2046 dated 16.12.2023) alongwith all the relevant documents.

6. Without commenting on the merit of the case, granting such liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U