← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2798/2016withdrawn

Sunil Kumar Goswami v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary And ORS

2023-01-30Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2798 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7406 of 2015 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Goswami, Son of late Mahadeo Goswami, resident of VillageJanidih, P.S.- Ghogha, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, namely Mr. Vyash Jee, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. Binay Kumar, The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Choudhary, the Divisional Commissioner, Bhagalpur Division, Bhagalpur.

4.

Mr. Adesh Titre Mare, the District Magistrate, District- Bhagalpur. 5.

Mr. Aruna Chandra Verma, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kahalgaon, DistrictBhagalpur. 6.

Mr. Radha Mohan Singh, the Circle Officer, Kahalgaon, District- Bhagalpur. 7.

Mr. Parushu Ram Singh, the Officer-in-Charge, of P.S.- Ghogha, DistrictBhagalpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lalit Narayan Jha, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Shilpa Singh, GA 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) 30-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present contempt application, the order under contempt has been complied with and, as such, the matter has become infructuous.

3. Learned counsel for the State reiterates and affirms

Patna High Court MJC No.2798 of 2016(2) dt.30-01-2023 2/2 the statements made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. In view of the above, the present contempt application stands disposed of.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) (Harish Kumar, J) Ranjeet/- U