← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6014/2020allowed

Sushil Choudhary @ Balma Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6014 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-807 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sushil Choudhary @ Balma Choudhary Son of Late Raj Kumar Choudhary Resident of Choudhary Nagar, Viratpur, P.S.- Town, Distt - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is in custody in connection with Excise Case No. 807 of 2019 for the offenses under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. In the instant case total 60 ltrs of country made liquor was recovered from the cow shed which is an open space. The petitioner is in custody since 06.01.2020.

Considering the fact that nothing was recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, the Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner, above named,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6014 of 2020(2) dt.03-02-2020 2/2 be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VII cum Special Judge (Excise), Aurangabad, in connection with Excise Case No. 807 of 2019. However, in the event the petitioner is found involved in similar cases in future, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner in the present case.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uma/- U T