Sindul Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6861 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2025 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna ======================================================
1. Sindul Devi, aged about 58 years, Female, Wife of Punit Rai.
2. Pankaj Kumar, aged about 30 years, Male, Son of Punit Rai.
3. Sachin Kumar, aged about 25 years, Male, son of Punit Rai. All are resident of Village Kamrapar, P.S. Athmalgola, Dist. Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Murari Narain Chaudhary, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025 dated 19.10.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 74, 352, 351(2) r/w 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the accused persons including the petitioners is of assaulting the informant and her family members, due to which they sustained head injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for throwing garbage in front of the house of the petitioners, a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6861 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 free fight is alleged to have taken place between the parties, owing to which, the injuries are said to have been sustained, for which, the husband of the petitioner no.1 was taken under judicial custody immediately after the incident, when he had gone to police station for lodging a case against the Informant.
5. It is the case of the petitioners that there is a case and counter case between the parties and the injuries have also been sustained by the petitioners for which the F.I.R. is said to have been lodged and the injuries are simple in nature, which does not corroborate the allegation leveled against the petitioners.
6. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account that there is a case and counter case between the parties and the injuries sustained is simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6861 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 Barh in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 379 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T