Vishwanath Sah @ Vishwanath Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9090 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2024 Thana- KATEYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Vishwanath Sah @ Vishwanath Singh S/o Late Moti Sah Resident of villageBhagwanpur, PS- Kateya, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Dubey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jagdhar Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-03-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 302, 504 and 506 of the IPC.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case and is in custody since 26.07.2024 and charge sheet has been submitted. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the informant alleges that his father was brutally assaulted by 23 named accused persons including the petitioner, but then allegation of assault is not specific, further the informant also alleges that his family members were also assaulted. It is next submitted that Ramnath Sah had
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9090 of 2025(2) dt.05-03-2025 2/2 approached this Court seeking bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.61734/2024 and the same was allowed by an order dated 11.12.2024 after considering the case in detail and on its merit. It is further submitted that even the allegation against the petitioner if not akin is similar to that of Ramnath Sah.
4. The learned APP for the State opposes the regular bail application of the petitioner.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond in the sum of Rs.10,000 /- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Kateya P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024.
6. It is made clear that if the learned Trial Court comes to a conclusion that petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner forthwith after recording reasons.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T