Hari Shankar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2724 of 2018 ====================================================== Hari Shankar Chaudhary, Son of Shri Laljee Chaudhary, resident of Village- Bangra, Post Office- Karom, Police Station- Guthani, DistrictSiwan. At present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher (In- charge Headmaster) in Govt. Middle School Alasgarh, Anchal- Andar, DistrictSiwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

5. The District Education Officer, Siwan.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan.

7. The District Treasury Officer, Siwan.

8. The District Accounts Officer, Siwan.

9. The Block Education Officer, Andar, District- Siwan.

10. The Headmaster-cum- Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Govt. Middle School Alasgarh, Anchal- Andar, District- Siwan. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy No.1- Sc13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is fully covered by Annexures-6, 11 and 12 i.e. order dated 31.03.2011 in C.W.J.C. No. 6139 of 2007, the order passed by the L.P.A. Bench in L.P.A. No. 756 of 2015 dated 16.08.2017 and order dated 01.11.2017 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14670 of 2014.

In view of the above, the writ application is disposed

Patna High Court CWJC No.2724 of 2018 (2) dt.16-02-2018 2/2 of with a direction to the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan to examine the case of the petitioners in the light of the decision of this Court as indicated hereinabove within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and extend the same benefit to the petitioners, if it is found covered by the decision in L.P.A. in view of the litigation policy of the State Government. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Uday/- U