← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10863/2026allowed

Raj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-24Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10863 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1649 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Raj Kumar Singh S/O Shatrudhan Singh R/O Village- Amba Lodipur, P.SBind, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Ram Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2), 111(2)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act.

3. It is alleged that this petitioner along with other coaccused persons was involved in making false ads on Facebook and Instagram and had done fraud in respect of granting PM Mudra Loan. In the name of granting said loan, the accused persons extracted sums between Rs.4,000/- and Rs.25,000/- from customers, after which they blocked the mobile number of the customers and did not return any money.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10863 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case due to suspicion. Further submission is that petitioner is a student and preparing for the competitive examination. There is no direct evidence against the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is not the owner of the flat from where the recovery has been made rather the same belongs to one Aman Raj. The charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation. Similarly situated co-accused persons, namely, Rajdeep Kumar and Suraj Bhaan Singh have already been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 70988 of 2025. Petitioner is in custody since 17.07.2025 having no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to co-operate in the trial. There is no chance of tampering with the evidence or absconding of the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted, similarly situated co-accused persons have been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10863 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 granted bail and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1649 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T