← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./7009/2026allowed

Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7009 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Bipin Kumar Son of Karu Yadav Resident of Village- Chautha, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 441 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 303(2), 317(5), 111(2), 316(2), 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The case of the prosecution in short is that stolen bike was kept with Bipin Kumar (the petitioner) for sale.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7009 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/3 case. He also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that the recovery of the said bike was made from the house of Manoj. He also submits that the FIR was not against the petitioner but during the course of investigation, one Amit has named the petitioner in his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. No recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner. He further submits that a statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 441 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7009 of 2026(2) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T