Mukesh Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4258 of 2020 ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mishra, aged about 40 years (Male), Son of Awadesh Kumar Mishra, R/o Road No. 9, Rajiv Nagar, Keshari Nagar, P.S. Rajiv Nagar, District- Patna, Proprietor of Patna Auto, Aashiana- Digha Road, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 3.

The Executive Officer, Sugauli, East Champaran, Motihari. 4.

The Consignee Officer Cum Reporting Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sugauli, East Champaran, Motihari.

5.

The Managing Director, Zila Uydog Kendra, Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Project Officer, Zila Uydog Kendra, Bihar, Patna. 7.

The Chairperson, GEM (Government e Market Place, 5 Jevantara Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi, Central Delhi, Delhi-110001 ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rakesh Ambastha, AC to AAG 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA) 28-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to make a representation before the District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

In case, any such representation is made within two weeks from today, the respondent no. 2 shall take a decision

Patna High Court CWJC No.4258 of 2020(2) dt.28-06-2022 2/2 thereon by way of a speaking order within two weeks thereafter. If still aggrieved, learned counsel for the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate remedy.

It is made clear that no interference can be there in the writ jurisdiction as disputed questions of fact are involved. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Rajan Gupta, J) (Shailendra Singh, J) P. Kumar U