Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39692/2014rejected

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-02-06Mr. Justice Amaresh Kumar Lal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39692 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -285 Year- 2013 Thana -KURHANI DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Ranjeet Kumar Son of Bindeshwar Singh Resident of Village -Kishunpur Mohini, P.S.- Kurhani, District -Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmala Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 06-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 304(B)/34 IPC. Allegation is that due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry, the deceased was assaulted due to which she died. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the deceased. He has been falsely implicated in this case as the inquest report shows that there was no injury on the body of the deceased. As per the witness of inquest report, the deceased had been killed due to assault on stomach.

Learned counsel for other side submits that during investigation the witnesses had stated that the petitioner used to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39692 of 2014 (4) dt.06-02-2015 2/2 take alcohol and thereafter used to assault the deceased. On the fateful day, deceased was also assaulted by the petitioner and his parents could not protest due to his fear. The doctor has opined that the deceased died due to assault by hard and blunt substance on her head. After investigation the case has been found true and the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances, in my opinion, the petitioner does not deserve bail at this stage. His prayer is rejected.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T