← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43637/2015dismissed

Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-18Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43637 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2011 Thana -PATNA GRP CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Yadav son of late Jamun Roy @ late Jamuna Roy, resident of village Raypura, P.S. Fatuha, District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in G.R.P. Mokama (Hathidah) P.S. case No.06 of 2011 (Sessions Trial No.756 of 2013) instituted for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge 4th, Barh, Patna.

This is the fourth attempt for grant of bail on behalf of the petitioner.

A report was called for from the Trial Court regarding the stage of the trial. It has been reported that the charges have been framed and the trial will be concluded within a period of six months.

The matter relates to the train dacoity, where the petitioner is said to have been apprehended with the looted

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43637 of 2015 (3) dt.18-08-2016 2/2 articles.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months. The District Magistrate, Patna and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna are also directed to ensure that the prosecution witnesses are produced on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that the trial may be concluded within the stipulated period.

Let this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Patna and the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T